Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Cisneros

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 29, 1995No. Civil A. 94-6317 (JCL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIFLAND, District Judge.

Currently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment as to the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1(n), the New Jersey “Anti-Eviction Act.” 1 Under the act, a tenant’s conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia entitles a residential landlord to regain summarily possession of his property. Plaintiff, who has twice plead guilty to possession of such paraphernalia, contends that termination of his tenancy will violate his rights guaranteed by the Double Jeopardy Clause, the Excessive Fines Clause, and the Due Process Clause. 2 For the reasons…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Taylor v. Secretary HUDCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Housing Authority v. MyersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API