Legal Opinion

King v. Miller

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM KNOX. No record found.

1Opinion of the CourtTurney, J.

Sec. 1 of ch. 106 of the acts of 1875, entitled “An Act to provide for bills of exceptions, and to regulate the practice when new trials are granted or refused,” was intended to give to the party excepting the benefit of the former trial, and of insisting upon an affirmance of that judgment, to the setting aside *383of which exceptions had been taken without regard to the merits of the case as developed on a subsequent trial. It seems to contemplate the revision by this court of each trial of a cause in the inferior court, however numerous, and from them the selection of such judgment as, in the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Panzer v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Howell v. Wallace E. Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API