Honeycutt v. . Burleson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe plaintiff’s wife was permitted to testify concerning the execution and tbe terms of tbe alleged contract between tbe plaintiff and tbe testator of tbe defendants, who was tbe mortgagee. An exception of the appellants contests tbe competency of her testimony on these points.
Upon tbe trial of an action a party or a, person interested in tbe event shall not be examined as a witness in bis own behalf or interest against tbe executor, administrator, or survivor of a deceased person concerning a personal transaction or communication between tbe witness and tbe deceased, except in-certain…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Linebarger v. Linebarger.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Helsabeck v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Lewis v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Hogan v. . UtterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Jones v. . EmorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turlington v. . NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Chemical Co. v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- In Re Will of PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933