Legal Opinion
Fidelity Nat. Bank v. United States Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 17, 1942No. 30106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
The Fidelity National Bank of Oklahoma City, hereinafter referred to as defendant, appeals from an order of the district court of Oklahoma county granting a new trial. There is no dispute as to the facts. It is conceded that a question of law only is involved and is properly presented in this appeal.
The cause was instituted by the United States Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the above-named bank, the State Highway Commission, R. S. Smith, doing business as Smith Construction Company, and various other parties. It was sought to enjoin the Highway Commission…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Farmers' Bank v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Wasco Co. v. New England Equitable Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- National Surety Corp. v. State National Bank of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SidwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. SidwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.