Legal Opinion
Lomelo v. Mayo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 30, 1967No. J-259PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
204 So.2d 550 (1967)
John LOMELO, Jr., et al., Petitioners,
v.
William T. MAYO et al., As Members of the Public Service Commission, Respondents.
No. J-259.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
November 30, 1967.
John W. Achor, Chipley, for petitioners.
Lewis W. Petteway and Prentice P. Pruitt, Tallahassee, for respondents.
WIGGINTON, Chief Judge.
This is a case of original jurisdiction in which petitioners seek a writ of prohibition against respondents. The purpose of the writ is to prohibit respondents from holding a hearing or proceeding to further consider a notice filed with it by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neal v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Hurford v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- Reid v. Southern Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Jackson v. HaisleySupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Gilliam v. SaundersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by20 opinions
- Taylor v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REG., ETC. v. HymanSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Belcher Oil Company v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of BeverageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Smith v. HinderyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.