Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hindery

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1984No. AS-389PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

454 So.2d 663 (1984)

Wayne and Vivian SMITH, Appellants,

v.

L.J. "Lu" HINDERY, Appellee.

No. AS-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 25, 1984.

Rehearing Denied August 27, 1984.

Thomas J. Farkash, Gainesville, for appellants.

W.G. Phillips, Gainesville, for appellee.

CORRECTED OPINION

MILLS, Judge.

Wayne and Vivian Smith, husband and wife, appeal from an order granting forfeiture of their interest in a pickup truck pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, Sections 932.701-932.704, Florida Statutes (1981). The Smiths contend that the pickup truck was held by the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Fleeman v. CaseSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Griffis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Winters v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Forfeiture of 1978 Chevrolet Van Vin: CGD1584167858Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Cabrera v. Dept. of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. United States v. One Single Family ResidenceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1988
  4. Amsouth Bank of Florida v. HepnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Mesa Petroleum Company v. C. John Coniglio, Mesa Petroleum Company v. Jay Nell Locke, and C. John ConiglioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API