Legal Opinion
Mollyneaux v. Wittenberg
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1894No. 5598PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error from the district court of Clay county. Tried below before Morris, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
March 24, 1891, the plaintiff in the lower court, plaintiff in error here, filed a petition in the district court of Clay county, Nebraska, as follows:
*548“1. Comes now the said plaintiff, and for a cause of action against the said defendants, says that heretofore, to-wit, on the 11th day of June, A. D. 1889, said plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate in Sutton, in Clay county, in the stale of Nebraska, which said real estate is fully described in a deed executed by this plaintiff and Margaret A. Mollyneaux, his wife, on the 11th day of June, A. D. 1889, whereby the said property, to-wit:
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cobbey v. KnappNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Securities Acceptance Corporation v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Uhlig v. BarnumNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Wittenberg v. MollyneauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Roberts v. LemontNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.