Wittenberg v. Mollyneaux
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Clay county. Tried below before Hastings, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
The plaintiffs in error were at one time owners of certain property in Sutton adapted to use as a hotel. The defendant in error, or his wife, owned hotel property in another part of the town. An exchange was effected whereby the hotel property of plaintiffs in error was conveyed to Mrs. Mollyneaux and that of Mollyneaux conveyed to plaintiffs in error. The deed conveying the latter contained the following: “The same not to be used for hotel purposes for two years from this date,” the deed being dated June 11, 1889. Mollyneaux sued, alleging that'he had continuously from the transfer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. WilhelmNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Gallagher v. M. E. Smith & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Mollyneaux v. WittenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- School District No. 8 v. EstesNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- French v. RamgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- O'Shea v. North American Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Chambers v. Spruce Lighting Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- James Poultry Co. v. City of Nebraska CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Roper v. MilbournNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.