Mitchell v. Lindstrom
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
For the purpose of reconstructing and converting his garage into a dwelling, plaintiff, the owner, entered into a contract with defendant Lindstrom as the general contractor. The other defendants named are subcontractors: defendant Makeever being the heating subcontractor who installed the oil burner; defendant Leiding being the oil burner-service subcontractor who serviced the burner; and defendant Manuel being the mason subcontractor who installed the chimney. After completion of the job a fire occurred. Based on breach of contract, plaintiff has sued the general contractor; and, based on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Cardinal v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Steinbock v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Dunn v. . National Surety CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- Stargatt v. AvenellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.