Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Lindstrom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

For the purpose of reconstructing and converting his garage into a dwelling, plaintiff, the owner, entered into a contract with defendant Lindstrom as the general contractor. The other defendants named are subcontractors: defendant Makeever being the heating subcontractor who installed the oil burner; defendant Leiding being the oil burner-service subcontractor who serviced the burner; and defendant Manuel being the mason subcontractor who installed the chimney. After completion of the job a fire occurred. Based on breach of contract, plaintiff has sued the general contractor; and, based on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Cardinal v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Steinbock v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Dunn v. . National Surety CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. American Home Assurance Co. v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Stargatt v. AvenellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  5. Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API