Waterwheel Realty, Inc. v. Mangiacotti

This appeal comes to us on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to Dist/Mun. Cts. R A. D. A, Rule 8B; however, the appellant failed to preserve his appellate rights. Stigum v. Skloff, 433 Mass. 1011 (2001). All but one of appellant’s requests for rulings of law were deemed waived by the trial judge as he found them “... not in compliance with [MRCP] Rule 64A(a)....” The remaining ruling that was not deemed waived was allowed. Although appellant’s Rule 8B2 statement states that he “... has appealed the rulings of law entered by the [Trial] Court..,” he never addressed the waiver of his…