Legal Opinion

Stigum v. Skloff

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 12, 2001PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Egil Stigum, brought suit on a promissory note, and after trial a judge in the Boston Municipal Court Department (BMC) found for the defendant, Robert Skloff. The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division of the BMC (appellate division), which affirmed the judgment. The plaintiff appealed to the Appeals Court. We granted his application for direct appellate review. We affirm for the reasons stated by the appellate division.

The plaintiff failed to preserve his appellate rights in two respects. First, although he included in his notice of appeal to the appellate division the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. WagnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Skowronski v. SachsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. Cardoza v. CardozaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
  3. 402 Rindge Corp. v. Ming TsaoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  4. 31-35, LLC v. ZuccoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Discover Realty Corp. v. DavidMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API