Makita Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
AQUILINO, Judge:
This is another case which raises issues of unusual sensitivity, including the propriety of judicial intervention in on-going administrative proceedings, protection of confidential information, effective assistance of counsel in the absence of access to such information and the interaction of attorneys in zealously representing the competing interests of the clients, to quote from Hyundai Pipe Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, 11 CIT 238, 1987 WL 8807 (1987).
I
In its notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations; Professional Electric Cutting Tools and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Mahaska Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Geo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated v. HusisianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Owens v. First Family Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2005
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.