Legal Opinion

Baltimore & O. R. v. Baker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1932No. 3281PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition for an order requiring the District Judge to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue requiring him to sign a bill of exceptions. It appears from the face of the petition that no bill of *628exceptions was tendered to him until after the term at which the ease was tried had expired, and that no order was entered extending the term for the purpose of settling and signing same. The only excuse offered for failure to have the hill settled: within the term is the delay of the stenographer in furnishing a transcript of the evidence, and belief on the part of counsel for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. In Re Bills of ExceptionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. Goetzinger v. WoodleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  2. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. Baltimore & O. R. v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  5. Joerns v. IrvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API