Bonneville Billing & Collection v. Torres
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
{1 Appellant Bonneville Billing & Collection appeals the denial of a motion to reconsider a default judgment rendered in its favor, but for less than the amount requested in the complaint. This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. We dismiss the appeal.
12 The trial court entered judgment on December 14, 1999. On January 24, 2000, Bonneville filed a "Motion to Reconsider." The motion was served on January 19, 2000. The trial court denied the motion on February 22, 2000. On March 22, 2000, Bonneville filed a notice of appeal.
13 Bonneville contends that…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & SonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Ron Shepherd Insurance, Inc. v. ShieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Reeves v. SteinfeldtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- DeBry v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
4Cited by4 opinions
- Radakovich v. CornabyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- Gillett v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Bank of New York Mellon v. Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Radakovich v. CornabyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006