Legal Opinion

Bonneville Billing & Collection v. Torres

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 30, 2000No. 20000254-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

{1 Appellant Bonneville Billing & Collection appeals the denial of a motion to reconsider a default judgment rendered in its favor, but for less than the amount requested in the complaint. This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. We dismiss the appeal.

12 The trial court entered judgment on December 14, 1999. On January 24, 2000, Bonneville filed a "Motion to Reconsider." The motion was served on January 19, 2000. The trial court denied the motion on February 22, 2000. On March 22, 2000, Bonneville filed a notice of appeal.

13 Bonneville contends that…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & SonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ron Shepherd Insurance, Inc. v. ShieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Reeves v. SteinfeldtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. DeBry v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Radakovich v. CornabyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  2. Gillett v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bank of New York Mellon v. Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  4. Radakovich v. CornabyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API