Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Denuys
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-1846PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.
The present ease involves an interpretation of Iowa Code sections 411.13 and 252D.8 (1995) in which the district court found that a mandatory wage withholding order to enforce a child support obligation could properly issue in reference to respondent Christopher DeNuys’ disability pension through the Municipal Fire and Police Retirement System of Iowa. Because we agree with the court’s conclusion, we affirm.
I. Background facts and‘proceedings. In 1979, petitioner Jane DeNuys married respondent Christopher DeNuys. In July 1994, Jane filed a petition to dissolve the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- In Re the Marriage of CarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lankford v. AllbeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Burke v. Iowa District Court for Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- In Re the Marriage of CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- In Re the Marriage of O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998
- In re the Marriage of WinnikeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.