Legal Opinion

Rienzi v. Goodin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1915No. Appeal, No. 66PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal, No. 66, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1914, No. 3699, for want of sufficient answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories in case of Luigi Rienzi v. Helen M. Goodin, Defendant,, and Walton Penniwell, and the Land Title & Trust Company, Trustees under deed of trust of Helen M. Goodin, Garnishees. Attachment sur judgment in assumpsit.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 66, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1914, No. 3699, for want of sufficient answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories in case of Luigi Rienzi v. Helen M. Goodin, Defendant,, and Walton Penniwell, and the Land Title & Trust Company, Trustees under deed of trust of Helen M. Goodin, Garnishees. Attachment sur judgment in assumpsit. Buie for judgment for want of sufficient answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories. [The facts appear in the following opinion by Martin, P. J.: On November 4, 1914, plaintiff commenced suit to recover from…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the clear opinion of the learned president judge of the court below, making absolute the rule for it on the answers of the garnishees' to the interrogatories filed by the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. C. I. T. Corporation v. FlintSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Bowers' Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. B.K. Medical Systems, Inc. Pension Plan v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Mogridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. King v. York Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API