Legal Opinion

Prudden v. First Nat. Bank of Secaucus

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant is a corporation and has its principal place of business in Ohio. Defendant was incorporated under the federal banking laws as a national bank, to do a general banking and trust business, with its banking house at Secaucus, in this state. Complainant was the owner of interest coupons on certain municipal bonds issued by the town of Secaucus, which coupons by their terms, were payable at the defendant bank. Prior to March 1st, 1933 (the coupon due date), defendant received the coupons direct from complainant with the following written instructions: "The enclosed collection items…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geo. F. Malcolm, Inc. v. Burlington, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Acuntius v. Steneck Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madden v. Wilde, St. Examr.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jacobson v. SlaughterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. McIlroy v. N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  4. Smith v. Federal Deposit Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1945
  5. State Trailer Sales, Inc. v. First National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API