Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hinkson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1983No. 14PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the lower court granting in part appellee’s motions to suppress physical evidence and certain statements on the basis of its finding of an unlawful warrantless search. 1 Appellant, the Commonwealth, contends that the search was lawful in that consent to search was given and because exigent circumstances were present. We agree that exigent circumstances existed and reverse the order of the court below. 2

On July 12, 1981, at about 12:40 a.m., Troopers James Dibler and John Balaska of the Pennsylvania State Police were on patrol when they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Paul Gary Rubin United States of America v. Louis Martin Agnes A/K/A Louis MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. United States v. Russell Dean JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. EhrsamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. AriondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. PetersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API