Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1968No. Appeal, 330PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,

Melvin Harris, appellant, was convicted by a jury in Philadelphia County of the crimes of burglary, larceny, receiving stolen goods and possession of burglary tools. Following dismissal of a motion for a new trial and imposition of sentence, an appeal was filed in the Superior Court which subsequently affirmed the judg ments, 209 Pa. Superior Ct. 27, 223 A. 2d 881 (1966). Judge Hoffman dissented. We granted allocatur.

The convictions rested in part upon the introduction in evidence, over objection, of a set of burglary tools and a brief case seized without a warrant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. DeJohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. PlatouSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. BeaufordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API