Legal Opinion

Meek v. Gem Boat Service, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1993No. 92-OT-010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Judge.

This case has twice before been appealed to this court, has twice been remanded, and now returns to this court following yet another notice of appeal. Appellants, a class composed of water and sewer customers of appellee, Gem Boat Service, Inc., n.k.a. Gem Beach Marina, Inc., present one assignment of error for consideration:

“I. The trial court erred by imposing sanctions against plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel.”

To understand the atmosphere which existed when the trial court issued the judgment appellants now challenge, a brief review of the facts and procedure of this case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Calderon v. SharkeyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Meek v. Gem Boat Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Revlon, Inc. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  2. Meek v. Gem Boat Service, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Patrick v. PatrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API