Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McKeithen
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided March 5, 1999No. Civ. A. 96-385-APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN V. PARKER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on motions for summary judgment submitted by both the plaintiffs 1 and defendants 2 and a motion to dismiss by the defendants which was converted into a motion for summary judgment by the court. There is no need for oral argument. Jurisdiction is based on federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
All motions were referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger for a report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report and recommendation has been filed and both sides have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000