Legal Opinion
AVETZUK v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 20, 2025No. 2:23-cv-22568Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STEPHEN AVETZUK, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:23-cv-22568 (BRM) THE HERTZ CORPORATION, et al., OPINION Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant The Hertz Corporation’s (“Hertz”) Motion to Dismiss pro se Plaintiff Stephen Avetzuk’s (“Plaintiff”) Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 31) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF Nos. 35–37) (the “Motion”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Hertz’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 42), and Hertz filed a Reply in support of its Motion (ECF…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.