Legal Opinion
Slingluff v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 26, 2005No. 04-9541PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Thomas Slingluff, appearing pro se, seeks review of a final decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission that affirmed the imposition of monetary penalties for violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (“OSHA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678 (2000). Our jurisdiction arises under 29 U.S.C. § 660(a). Because we conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and that Mr. Slingluff is subject to OSHA’s requirements, we affirm. 1
I
Mr. Slingluff owns a small commercial stuccoing business called Stuck in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Robbins v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Enrique Colin Ballesteros v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Cyndee Smith v. Castaways Family Diner and Carrol A. Gonzalez, Doing Business as Castaways Family DinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. Von EschenbachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- F & H Coatings, LLC v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.