Ward v. State

OPINION

McCORMICK, Judge.

Appellants were tried jointly and convicted of false imprisonment. Punishment in Cause No. 62,024 was assessed at sixty days’ confinement and a $350 fine. Punishment in Cause No. 62,025 was assessed at ninety days’ confinement and a $500 fine. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

Appellants contend that the infor-mations are fundamentally defective for failing to allege that the restraint was “without consent.” The instant informa-tions alleged that appellants

“... did then and there unlawfully, intentionally and knowingly restrain Kenneth Rubin Quintana,…