Legal Opinion

Hadjarab v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2005-1504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Shaker Aamer, Nabil Hadjarab, and Ahmed Belbacha are detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. They have all been cleared for release. 2 In protest of their continued detention, they have joined others at Guantanamo Bay in a lengthy hunger strike. Petitioners wish to starve themselves, perhaps to death. The Joint Medical Group (JMG) relies on enteral feeding when detainees refuse to take nutrients orally to keep themselves alive and healthy. Petitioners seek an injunction against the Government’s insistence on feeding them through a nasogastric tube…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaker Aamer v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. In Re: Khatri Chhetri Sher BahadurDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
  3. MP PPH LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Michael L. Greene v. Miranda Bordelon et alDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API