Legal Opinion

Jaramillo v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1998No. 18051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Chief Judge.

{1} Plaintiff, Ernest Jaramillo, was fired from his position as a mechanic for the City of Albuquerque (City) when a drug test on May 22, 1991 revealed metabolites of marijuana in his urine. On November 24,1993 he filed suit for declaratory and compensatory relief against the City and its Chief Administrative Officer, Arthur Blumenfeld, in his official capacity. After a bench trial on June 25, 1996, the district court entered judgment for Defendants on November 8, 1996. Jaramillo contends on appeal that the drug test violated his rights under the United States…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Mark B. Harmon v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MunozNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API