Legal Opinion

In Re: Taylor Made Golf Co.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 30, 2014No. 2013-1552Unpublished

1Per curiam

The issue on appeal is whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeals Board erred in not rejecting on grounds of obviousness claims 8, 9, 12, and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 7,344,-450 (the '450 patent). These claims are directed to a method involving press fitting or latching weights to a golf club. Because the Board erroneously failed to consider the general knowledge possessed by one skilled in the art of press fitting in applying the obviousness standard, we vacate the Board’s decision and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

The '450 patent was filed on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Randall Mfg. v. ReaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. Rambus Inc. v. ReaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API