Legal Opinion

Petry v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 28, 1912No. 896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 27889 (T. D. 32314).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Certain machines especially adapted to the gold lettering of leather, cardboard, and similar heavy materials, and to the stamping or embossing thereon of gold designs, were classified by the collector at the port of New York as manufactures in part of metal, dutiable at 45 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 199, tariff act of 1909, which paragraph reads as follows:

199. Articles or wares not specially provided for in this section, composed wholly or in part of iron, steel, lead, copper, nickel, pewter, zinc, gold, silver, platinum, aluminum, or other metal, and whether…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelvin & Hughes America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Marconi International Marine Communications Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. United States v. Draeger Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API