Legal Opinion

Kelvin & Hughes America Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 29, 1964No. C.D. 2468PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE, Judge:

An importation described on the invoice as “Echo Sounding Equipment Type Ms.30.” was classified by the collector of customs as depth-sounding devices, instruments, or mechanisms, *22intended or suitable for measuring time, distance, or speed, valued over $10 each, in paragraph 368(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 368(a)), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of $1.15 each and 17% per centum ad valorem. Certain parts thereof were assessed with duty at the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marconi International Marine Communications Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Petry v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. U.S.D. Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. Marconi International Marine Communication Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Ercona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Kelvin & Hughes America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API