Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1986No. Appeal, No. 2620 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barbieri,

Enoch Bailey, Claimant, appeals here an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board denying him compensation benefits for a work-related injury suffered in the course of his employment with Pittsburgh Tube Company. The disallowance is based solely on the referees determination, affirmed by The Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board), that a timely notice was not given the employer within the meaning of provisions in Sections 311, 312 and 313 of the Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act).1

Claimants last day of work was apparently May 22, 1980, on which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Holshue v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. E.J.T. Construction., Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Rinehimer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Erie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. City of Erie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API