Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Evening Bulletin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the referee properly found that the instant employer, The Evening Bulletin, a former Philadelphia newspaper, had knowledge of claimant’s concurrent employment for purposes of computing claimant’s average weekly wage pursuant to Section 309(e) of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act 1 (Act) in effect at the time of the claimant’s injury.
In a prior opinion 2 we remanded the instant case to the Commonwealth Court for review of the proper rate of compensation to appellant, Harold D. Katz, after holding that appellant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Katz v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Fidelity Bank v. PiersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- National Bank v. SteverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Jackson v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Rosenberry v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Zaccaro v. ShahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.