Feldman v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.

The sole assignment of error is directed to the entry of the judgment affirming the ruling of the clerk dismissing the proceedings. In this we find no error.

The agreement is clear and unambiguous. It is not open to the objection that the line along which the pipes were to be laid is not defined in the grant. The agreement expressly gave the grantee the right to select the route. Petitioners’ contention the grant is void for vagueness cannot be sustained. Gas Co. v. Day, 249 N.C. 482, 106 S.E. 2d 678.

The right to lay the additional lines created a presently vested interest and subjected the…