Legal Opinion

Rock Island Plow Co. v. Cut Bank Implement Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1935No. 7,445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendants, the Cut Bank Implement Company, a copartnership consisting of Alfred Klein and Edward Murphy, and the copartners individually, have appealed from a judgment and decree of foreclosure entered against them and in favor of the plaintiff, the Rock Island Plow Company, a corporation.

The record discloses that prior to 1924 the defendants were indebted to the predecessor of the plaintiff, the Northern Rock Island Plow Company, in excess of $19,000, and had turned over to the creditor certain notes of a face value of approximately $16,000 as “collateral security” for the debt. On…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Sonoma Valley Bank v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Averill Machinery Co. v. BainMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hawley Bros. Hardware Co. v. BrownstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. First State Bank of Amarillo v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Michigan Aero Club v. ShelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Nevada-Douglas Consolidated Copper Co. v. BerryhillNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Olson v. McLeanMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Estate of Pfeifer-MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Hughes v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API