Legal Opinion

Wittes v. Repko

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 20, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

With respect to the intrinsic merits of the application to open the apparent default of respondents in the suit, and for leave to redeem, we are in accord with the views expressed by the learned vice-chancellor, and think further discussion needless. But on the phase of the case relating to the force and effect of the amendment of 1928 (P.L. p. 382), to section 49 of the Tax Sale act of 1918, we prefer to rest our affirmance of the decree on the application of the fundamental rule that a statute is to be considered prospective unless the language is such as to show clearly that it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Plahn v. GivernaudSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  2. Williams v. BrokawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Besson v. CoxNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Swanke v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Strube v. Travelers Indemn. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. CASSAN EX REL. CASSAN v. FernNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. D.C. v. F.R.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API