City of Seward v. Klenk
Nebraska Supreme Court
Motion to quash bill of exceptions. Cases cited by counsel are referred to in opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Reese, Ch. J.
This is a motion filed by defendant in error to quash the bill of exceptions, the principal ground being that the *616bill of exceptions was not reduced to writing and served upon defendant in error within the time required by law. It appears from the record that the cause was tried to a jury at the regular March, 1888, term of the district court and a verdict was rendered in favor of defendant in error on the 7th day of that month. On the 9th day, and within three days after the return of the verdict, plaintiff in error filed its motion for a new trial. No order was asked by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Omaha & Northern Nebraska Railroad v. RedickNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Monroe v. ElburtNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
- Donovan v. SherwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Wineland v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Dodge v. RunelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City National Bank v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Hanscom v. LantryNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Jones v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Marrow v. AmbroseNebraska Supreme Court · 1896