Legal Opinion

Monte A. Ruffin v. Congressional Budget Office

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 10, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge

Monte Ruffin, a computer support specialist at the Congressional Budget Office, has sued his employer for various instances of alleged discrimination. The CBO has moved to dismiss the final count of Ruf-fin’s amended complaint — hostile work environment — arguing that Ruffin failed to exhaust that particular claim under the informal processes peculiar to the Congressional Accountability Act. As explained below, the Court agrees.

BACKGROUND

The factual allegations in the complaint will be taken as true. Ruffin, an African-American man,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Moran v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Hyson v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burcham v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms for the United States SenateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  2. Caul v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API