Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Moore County

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1999No. COA98-1007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident and citizen of the United Kingdom, challenges the validity of a tax foreclosure sale conducted by the Moore County Tax Department pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-375. In 1987, plaintiff, who was then residing in Hong Kong, purchased a lot at the Pinehurst Resort and Country Club. A few years later, plaintiff moved back to England and resided at Snows Ride Windlesham, 14 Hawkes Leap, Surrey, England. Plaintiff furnished this address to the Tax Department and received tax notices at that address. He paid the property taxes assessed by Moore County in 1990…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Jenkins v. Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Regis of Onslow County v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Da Dai Mai v. Carolina Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Hardy v. Moore CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API