Legal Opinion
Surgical Associates of Houston, P.A. v. Rensel
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 6, 2024No. 4:23-cv-04719Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 06, 2024 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SURGICAL ASSOCIATES OF § HOUSTON, P.A., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-cv-4719 § KIMBERLY RENSEL, § § Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court1 is pro se Defendant Kimberly Rensel’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) and Plaintiff Surgical Associates of Houston, P.A.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Strike and Request for Sanctions (ECF No. 18) on Defendant’s “Submission Against the Response to Motion to Dismiss,” which the Court construes as…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.