Legal Opinion

Gomila & Co. v. Hibernia Insurance

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1888No. 10,147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. VoorMes, J. Quoted the following authorities, viz: Jamos K. Bell vs. Western Ins. Co., 5 R. 423; Com may vs. Company, 12 La. 240; Lemmes vs. Company, 13 Ann. 504; Woodruff vs. Company, 5 Aon. 697, p 699; Philips vs. St. Louis Ins. Co., 11 Ann. 459; 3 Kent’s Com p. 331; 11 Rob. 255; John Riley vs. Ocean Ins.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. VoorMes, J. Quoted the following authorities, viz: Jamos K. Bell vs. Western Ins. Co., 5 R. 423; Com may vs. Company, 12 La. 240; Lemmes vs. Company, 13 Ann. 504; Woodruff vs. Company, 5 Aon. 697, p 699; Philips vs. St. Louis Ins. Co., 11 Ann. 459; 3 Kent’s Com p. 331; 11 Rob. 255; John Riley vs. Ocean Ins. Co., 1 Taunt., 325; Sterling vs. Vaughn, IlEast, 619; Ronth vs. Thompson, 13 Id., 274; Wolf vs. Ilorncasfcle, 1 B. and P,, 316; Hagedom vs. diverso», 2 H. and S., 485; Jefferson Ins. Co. vs. Cotheal, 7 • Wend., 72 ; Fleming…

1Opinion of the Court

*554The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Poci-ní, J.

This litigation grows out of a contract of insurance of a cargo of coffee and cigars, shipped from Vera Cruz to Matamoras, Mexico, the amount covered by insurance being $9300, and the same is herein claimed by plaintiffs on an alleged total loss of the cargo.

As no regular policy of insurance was issued, plaintiffs declare on two separate applications made by them and accepted by the defendant, one for $4500 and the other for $4800, on an open marine policy which they then carried on with the defendant, both applications having been made and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Courtnay v. Mississippi Marine & Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1838

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Webb v. V. S. & P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Julius Kessler & Co. v. E. F. Perilloux & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API