Legal Opinion

Webb v. V. S. & P. Ry. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1928No. 3235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.

2Per curiam

BY THE COURT. An application for rehearing has been applied for by both the appellee and appellant. Appellee asks that a rehearing be granted in order that this Court, may correct its decree by allowing interest from judicial demand, instead of from the date of the judgment. The judgment of the lower court allowed interest only from the date of the judgment. The ease was appealed by defendant, and in this Court the appellee filed a motion to amend the judgment so as to allow interest from judicial demand. Inasmuch as this point was not stressed by counsel for…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Graf v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  3. Gomila & Co. v. Hibernia InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  4. Olson v. American Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Webb v. V. S. & P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Pratt v. Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API