Legal Opinion

United States v. Baca

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 14, 2009No. 2:08-at-00080PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING APPEAL FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION (DOC. 86)

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lorenzo Baca (“Appellant” or “Baca”) appeals his convictions following a bench trial by a magistrate judge for (1) engaging in a business in a national park in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 5.3; and (2) for traversing a cultural resource in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 2.1(a)(5). Baca raises three issues on appeal: (1) that the magistrate judge abused his discretion in refusing to recuse himself for creating the appearance of a lack of impartiality; (2) that there…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. (PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. Seifert v. PritchardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. Tanbeer Singh Brar v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Tanbeer Singh Brar v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API