Legal Opinion

Seifert v. Pritchard

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 27, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01097Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEXANDRA SEIFERT, Case No.: 1:24-cv-01097-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND AMENDED MOTION FOR RECUSAL 13 v. AND DISQUALIFICATION 14 KENNETH GEORGE PRITCHARD, et al., (Docs. 26, 28) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Alexandra Seifert is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action 18 brought pursuant to

18 U.S.C. §§ 241

and 242, 18 U.S.C. § 1018, 28 U.S.C. § 454,

42 U.S.C. §§ 19

1983 and 1985. (Doc. 1). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for recusal and 20…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Leslie v. Grupo ICACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. $292,888.04 in U.S. Currency, Calvin L. Robinson, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API