Legal Opinion

State v. Hatch

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1974No. 7415SC88PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendants assign error to the trial court’s denial of the jury’s request that the court reporter read back a portion of the testimony. There is no merit to this assignment; for as we said in State v. Crane, 11 N.C. App. 721, 182 S.E. 2d 225 (1971), it is discretionary with the court to grant or refuse the jury’s request for a restatement of the evidence. There is likewise no merit to the assignment of error to the court’s refusal of the jury’s request that additional testimony be taken. It is defendants’ contention that the request was denied, not in the exercise *150of discretion,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. CulpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. HatchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API