Bussen v. BE&K Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
We have granted certiorari review to consider the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in this workers’ compensation case. See Bussen v. BE&K Construction Co., 728 So.2d 617 (Ala.Civ.App.1997). The single legal issue presented is whether an employer is statutorily entitled to subrogation to recover medical-benefits payments it has made and those it will be obligated to make in the future, or whether the employer’s right of subrogation applies only to the amounts already paid.
The dispute between the employer and the employee involves an interpretation of § 25-5 — 11(a),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte HolladaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Shelton v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Richard v. ArsenaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Bilodeau v. Oliver Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trott v. Brinks, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- MILLER AND MILLER CONSTR. CO. v. MadewellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte Be&k Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Adam P. Harrington v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court: CV-18-903102).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025
- Alabama Home Builders Self Insurers Fund, Inc. v. Christy Tumlin, as the personal representative of the Estate of Timothy Michael Tumlin, and as the dependent spouse of Timothy Michael Tumlin, (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-22-902792).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.