Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Clerk of the Third District Court

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 24, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

Eastman Kodak Company commenced in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County a “civil action in the nature of [a] petition for [a] writ of mandamus” (see Mass. R. Civ. P. 81 [b], 365 Mass. 841 [1974]; G. L. c. 249, § 5) to compel official action by Joseph D. Conway, clerk of the Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex, under G. L. c. 231, § 104 (reproduced in the margin) ,1 providing for removal of certain District *234Court actions to the Superior Court. A single justice of this court reserved and reported the case, without decision, to the full bench upon a stipulation of facts, with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Porter v. Clerk of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Clay v. BarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Third National Bank of Hampden County v. CONT. INS. COMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Third National Bank v. Continental InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. W. Barrington Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  4. Madigan v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API