Legal Opinion

Madigan v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 31, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

We believe everyone’s difficulty with paragraph (d) of § 31 of the zoning ordinance has resulted largely from taking that paragraph out of its context. The concluding portion of § 30 of the ordinance (see exhibit B attached to the plaintiff’s affidavit) sets out a number of main uses in connection with which an owner must provide off-street parking, as well as the minimum number of parking spaces required in connection with each such use; some of those uses require a license for the parking spaces from the license board (see G. L. c. 148, § 56, as amended), while others do not. Paragraphs (a)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. W. Barrington Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Clerk of the Third District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API