Legal Opinion
People v. Arbeiter
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 19, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered October 27, 1994 modified, on the law and on the facts, by denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the charges of disorderly conduct and by reinstating the accusatory instruments insofar as they relate to those charges; as modified order affirmed.
The discretionary power to dismiss a pending criminal prosecution in the interest of justice is to be exercised sparingly (see, People v Hudson, 217 AD2d 53, 55; People v Harmon, 181 AD2d 34, 36) and upon reviewing the record in these consolidated appeals, we conclude that none of these matters presents the rare…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- People v. GragertCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
- People v. BerardiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
- People v. DodardCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
- Rech v. The City of BataviaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020