Legal Opinion

Baylin v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 4, 1984No. 113, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUCH, Judge.

This appeal involves the question of the measure of compensation to be applied where approximately 30 years elapses between the initial design of a highway project and the ultimate taking of private property for a substantially enlarged public project. The issue now before the Court is whether evidence of enhanced value, under the circumstances present here, may be introduced at a jury trial on the issue of just compensation. We granted certiorari prior to consideration by the Court of Special Appeals to address this issue of first impression in Maryland.

(I)

The Facts

In 1948,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Roads Commission of State Highway Administration v. KaminsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. Overnite Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. The Metropolitan Gov. of Nashville and Davidison County, Tennessee and The Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority v. Overnite Transportation Company - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API