Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Siff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

The action was against the defendant as indorser of a promissory note. The defendant admitted the indorsement and non-payment, but alleged, by way of defense, facts showing that the consideration of the note was illegal. The note in question was one of a series given to plaintiff, as plaintiff contends, in consideration of the assignment of plaintiff’s claim against Siff Brothers, a firm consisting of Max and Albert Siff, bankrupts. The facts, briefly, are as follows: Max Siff was the father of Albert Siff. They were engaged in the wholesale manufacture of clothing under the firm name of Siff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bulger v. . RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Meyer v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Klaw v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. M. Deutsch, Inc. v. Robert Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API