Legal Opinion
Murray v. First National Bank of Chicago (In Re Murray)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 1999No. 19-11113PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The instant adversary proceeding (“the Proceeding”) was instituted by TYRONE MURRAY (“the Debtor”) against THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, as Trustee (“the Defendant”), alleging violations of the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (“HOEPA”) amendments to the federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601, et seq. (“the TILA”); the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. §§ 201-1, et seq. (referenced here by its generic designation as a law regulating unfair and deceptive nets and practices,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Frascatore v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Frascatore)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Ralls v. Bank of New York (In Re Ralls)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Steinbrecher v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Steinbrecher)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Philadelphia Consumer Discount Co. v. Gurst (In Re Gurst)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dash v. FIRSTPLUS HOME LOAN TRUST 1996-2District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Cooper v. First Government Mortg. and Investors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dawson v. Thomas (In Re Dawson)District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Jenkins v. Mercantile Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.